top of page

Intellectual Property for Startups: Legal and Strategic Foundations for Competitiveness

  • Writer: Guilherme Henrique Soares
    Guilherme Henrique Soares
  • Nov 14
  • 4 min read

Innovation as a Central Asset in the Startup Ecosystem


The contemporary business environment is marked by intense competition, technological speed and highly scalable business models. In this scenario, Intellectual Property (IP) has ceased to be a mere bureaucratic requirement and has become one of the main value pillars for startups at all stages — from ideation to advanced investment rounds. Proprietary technologies, software, trademarks, data, design and know-how are, in many cases, the true competitive differentiators that determine a company’s survival and sustainable growth.


Despite its relevance, IP is still often overlooked by entrepreneurs who prioritize product development and fundraising. This omission can generate significant risks: loss of exclusivity, litigation, operational restrictions, valuation limitations and direct setbacks in due diligence processes. Understanding the legal logic of Intellectual Property is therefore essential for founders, managers and investors seeking efficient strategies for protecting and exploiting intangible assets.


The Legal Dimension of Innovation: Why Intellectual Property Is Strategic


Intellectual Property comprises a set of rights that allow the holder to control the use of intellectual creations, offering legal security, predictability and defense mechanisms against copying or misappropriation. For startups, which operate with emerging technologies and disruptive models, this security is crucial for forming partnerships, attracting investors and building effective barriers to entry.


In Brazil, the legal framework is primarily composed of the Industrial Property Law (Law 9.279/1996), the Copyright Law (Law 9.610/1998), the Civil Rights Framework for the Internet, the LGPD, and international treaties. These instruments regulate various protection modalities, such as patents, trademarks, software, industrial designs, trade secrets and copyrights over content and algorithms.


The proper choice of legal instrument depends on the nature of the innovation. Technologies with inventive character may be patentable; source codes are automatically protected by copyright; business models are not patentable but can be safeguarded through trade secrets or well-structured contracts. Understanding these distinctions is essential to avoid common mistakes, such as registering trademarks without prior availability searches or publicly disclosing technologies before securing protection.

Brand Protection: Identity and Market Positioning


The trademark is often the first registrable asset of a startup. It represents reputation, origin and differentiation in the market, and it is central to marketing and expansion strategies. Registration with the INPI grants nationwide exclusivity and significantly reduces the risk of conflicts, use restrictions or mandatory rebranding — a problem that may be extremely costly in advanced growth stages.


Beyond registration, startups should adopt best practices such as availability due diligence, risk analysis for franchise or licensing operations, international protection for expansion plans, and active portfolio management. Lack of planning can compromise negotiations with investors who view strong brands as relevant assets in corporate evaluations.


Patents and Proprietary Technologies: Exclusivity and Scalability


Patent protection is one of the most robust IP mechanisms, granting temporary exclusivity over inventions that meet legal requirements of novelty, inventive step and industrial application. For technology-based startups in biotechnology, digital health, hardware, chemistry, energy or artificial intelligence, patents may represent the main barrier to entry against competitors.


However, the patenting process requires strategy, prior confidentiality and careful evaluation of the invention’s scope. Informal disclosure in pitches, events, conversations with partners or academic publications may compromise the patent application. It is also essential to evaluate the feasibility of international expansion via PCT, considering costs, strategic markets and investment timelines.


Although not every software solution is patentable, certain technical applications may qualify — an assessment that requires integrated legal and technical analysis.


Software, Algorithms and Protection through Copyright


Startups operating digital platforms, SaaS, artificial intelligence and automation depend on source code and algorithmic models that constitute sensitive intellectual assets. In Brazil, software registration — although optional — is recommended for evidentiary purposes and can be decisive in disputes, partnerships or technology transfer.


Copyright protection is automatic, but governance over the development cycle must be carefully structured. Clear contracts with programmers, collaborators and third parties are essential to prevent disputes over ownership. The same applies to copyrighted content such as manuals, interfaces, visual designs, layouts and original databases.

AI-based solutions raise additional challenges related to authorship, dataset usage, regulatory compliance and third-party risks. Continuous legal guidance is becoming essential in this rapidly evolving regulatory field.


Trade Secrets and Contracts as Competitive Defense Instruments


Not every innovation should be patented. In many cases, maintaining a trade secret can be more efficient, particularly when competitive value lies in formulas, internal processes, data strategies or business models that are not patentable.


To effectively hold a trade secret, the startup must implement measures such as confidentiality agreements (NDAs), non-compete clauses and internal policies that restrict access to sensitive information. Without formal protection mechanisms, the secret loses its legal effectiveness.


Moreover, contracts with technology partners, developers, suppliers, accelerators and collaborators must include clear clauses on assignment of rights, confidentiality, liability and compliance. The absence of such instruments is one of the main causes of litigation involving startups in expansion stages.


Due Diligence and Fundraising: IP as an Indicator of Business Maturity


During investment rounds, legal audits — especially in seed, Series A and Series B — rigorously evaluate the startup’s Intellectual Property structure. National and international funds typically verify registrations, ownership, contracts, licensing, infringement risks and governance over intangible assets.


Disorganized IP management can reduce valuation, delay closing rounds or even prevent transactions. Founders should therefore adopt internal IP compliance policies from the outset, documenting development workflows, ensuring ownership and monitoring registrations.


Regulatory Environment, LGPD and Data Protection as Part of IP Strategy


The Brazilian General Data Protection Law (LGPD) directly impacts startups that rely on personal data as part of their value proposition. Data processing must comply with legal principles of necessity, purpose and security, affecting both the company’s reputation and competitiveness. Dataset usage may involve copyrights, licensing contracts and shared responsibilities.


Integrating data protection compliance and Intellectual Property governance is an increasingly relevant trend, particularly for healthtechs, fintechs, edtechs and adtechs.


The Importance of Preventive Legal Counsel for Reducing Risks and Expanding Opportunities


Intellectual Property should not be seen as a formality but as an essential part of the business strategy for startups seeking sustainable innovation, competitiveness and expansion. Preventive legal measures reduce future costs, avoid litigation, strengthen investor negotiations and build solid foundations for growth.


While many decisions may be initiated by entrepreneurs themselves, the technical complexity requires, at key moments, specialized legal guidance — especially in registrations, contracts, technology transfer and viability analysis. Preventive and strategic legal action allows the startup to focus on developing innovative solutions with security and regulatory compliance.

© 2024 by Soares, Goulart & Caetano Lawyers

  • Whatsapp
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • Facebook
bottom of page